Find weaknesses before attackers do.
SecAgent™ combines specialist security agents, deterministic testing modules, evidence capture, human approval gates, and AI-assisted analysis to assess authorized websites and web applications.
A coordinated security workforce for the web.
SecAgent™ is designed as an orchestrated team rather than a single scanner. Each agent has a defined security responsibility while a central scope gateway restricts active testing to approved assets.
Recon & Attack Surface
Maps approved domains, endpoints, technologies, forms, APIs, authentication surfaces, security headers, TLS posture, and application routes.
Identity & Session Testing
Evaluates authentication, session management, password-reset logic, cookie protections, logout behavior, and role boundaries using approved test accounts.
Controlled Vulnerability Testing
Uses safe, deterministic test modules and validation workflows to investigate suspected weaknesses without treating every scanner signal as a confirmed vulnerability.
API & Business Logic
Analyzes authorized APIs, object-level authorization, workflow state changes, rate controls, and business rules that ordinary scanners can miss.
Evidence & Correlation
Preserves test evidence, deduplicates findings, correlates related weaknesses, and separates confirmed findings from observations and rejected signals.
Remediation & Retest
Produces developer-focused remediation guidance and supports focused verification after fixes are deployed.
Walk through the SecAgent client experience.
This sliding demonstration shows what a client sees from engagement setup through testing, higher-impact approval, findings, remediation, and verified improvement. All names and metrics below are illustrative.
Client Overview
Baseline Metrics
Baseline risk profile before remediation. These demo values are not live scan results.
Multi-Agent Pentest Activity
Specialist agents operate only inside the approved scope and feed evidence into the validation layer.
Live Activity Timeline
Safety Monitor
Controlled Higher-Impact Validation Request
SecAgent may recommend stronger validation, but the action cannot run until the named client approver and ARC2 reviewer approve this exact test.
Approval Chain
Built-In Safeguards
Validated Findings
Official Report Preview
Baseline security score
Verified security score
Before vs. After Analysis
Illustrative results show how SecAgent converts an initial risk baseline into prioritized remediation work, then verifies fixes through targeted retesting.
Client Outcome
From authorization to verified remediation.
SecAgent uses a controlled engagement workflow so clients know exactly what happens and when.
Comprehensive web security evaluation
SecAgent is designed to evaluate the full security posture of an authorized website or web application—not just run a handful of automated checks. The exact test set depends on the client’s approved scope, architecture, authentication model, APIs, third-party integrations, and safety constraints. Findings are validated, correlated, prioritized, and converted into remediation guidance and retest criteria.
- Domain, subdomain, host, and service inventory within approved scope
- Technology stack and framework fingerprinting
- HTTP/HTTPS service discovery and redirect analysis
- Public endpoint and route enumeration
- Robots.txt, sitemap, metadata, and exposed path review
- JavaScript route, API, and client-side endpoint discovery
- Administrative and management interface exposure review
- Exposed development, staging, backup, and debug resources
- Publicly accessible cloud/storage references discovered through the application
- TLS version and protocol configuration review
- Certificate validity, hostname, chain, and expiry checks
- HTTPS enforcement and insecure redirect behavior
- HSTS evaluation
- Content Security Policy review
- X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy review
- Clickjacking / framing protection evaluation
- Mixed-content and insecure resource loading checks
- Cache-control and sensitive response caching review
- Login workflow review
- Username/account enumeration behavior
- Password policy and credential handling checks
- Password reset and account recovery workflow review
- Multi-factor authentication implementation review
- Remember-me and persistent login behavior
- Rate limiting and credential attack resistance
- Lockout / throttling behavior
- Default or weak administrative access exposure checks
- Authentication bypass hypotheses and validation
- Session cookie Secure, HttpOnly, and SameSite attributes
- Session fixation resistance
- Session rotation after authentication and privilege change
- Idle and absolute timeout behavior
- Logout and server-side invalidation
- Concurrent session behavior
- Session token predictability and exposure review
- Cross-origin session behavior
- Token leakage through URLs, referrers, logs, or client storage
- Horizontal access control / IDOR-style checks
- Vertical privilege escalation checks
- Role boundary verification
- Forced browsing and hidden route access checks
- Unauthorized object and record access testing
- Function-level authorization review
- Administrative action restrictions
- Tenant-isolation checks in multi-tenant applications
- Access-control consistency between UI and API layers
- SQL and NoSQL injection assessment
- Cross-site scripting (reflected, stored, DOM-based)
- Command injection hypotheses and controlled validation
- Server-side template injection checks
- LDAP, XPath, header, and parameter injection review where relevant
- Path traversal / file path manipulation
- HTTP parameter pollution
- Unsafe deserialization indicators
- XML parser / XXE exposure where XML is accepted
- CRLF / response splitting behavior
- DOM-based trust boundary review
- Client-side storage of sensitive information
- Unsafe JavaScript sinks and dynamic execution patterns
- Third-party script and dependency exposure
- Cross-origin resource sharing (CORS) configuration
- Cross-site request forgery protections
- Open redirect behavior
- PostMessage origin validation
- Frontend source map and debug artifact exposure
- REST, JSON, and documented API endpoint review
- Object-level authorization
- Function-level authorization
- Token and API key handling
- Method restrictions and verb tampering checks
- Mass assignment / over-posting behavior
- Excessive data exposure
- Schema and type validation
- Rate limiting and abuse resistance
- Error handling and sensitive data leakage
- GraphQL introspection, authorization, and query control review when applicable
- WebSocket authentication, authorization, and message handling review when applicable
- File type, extension, MIME, and content validation
- Upload storage location and execution risk review
- Filename/path manipulation
- Download authorization and direct object access
- Archive handling and unsafe extraction patterns
- Image/document processing attack surface review
- Temporary-file and upload-cleanup behavior
- Content disposition and browser rendering safety
- Server-side request forgery (SSRF) exposure
- Webhook destination validation
- Callback and redirect trust boundaries
- Internal service exposure through application features
- Third-party integration authentication review
- OAuth/OIDC flow configuration checks where applicable
- SAML integration configuration review where applicable
- External API secret handling and leakage checks
- Workflow sequencing and step-skipping
- Price, quantity, discount, and transaction manipulation
- Approval and authorization workflow bypass
- Duplicate action / replay behavior
- State-transition validation
- Privilege changes across workflows
- Account onboarding and entitlement logic
- Password-reset and recovery abuse scenarios
- Payment and checkout logic review when explicitly authorized
- Abuse cases unique to the client’s business process
- Verbose error messages and stack traces
- Server banner and version disclosure
- Exposed configuration files
- Backup, temporary, archive, and source files
- Directory listing behavior
- Environment / debug endpoint exposure
- Default files and sample applications
- Source-control artifact exposure
- Credentials, tokens, or secrets exposed in client-accessible content
- Unnecessary HTTP methods
- Outdated public-facing frameworks and libraries
- Known-vulnerability indicators in exposed components
- Client-side package/library version exposure
- Unsupported software indicators
- Third-party widget and plugin exposure
- Risk correlation between vulnerable components and reachable attack paths
- Sensitive data exposure in responses
- PII or confidential data in client-side code or storage
- Sensitive parameters in URLs
- Secrets/tokens in JavaScript or downloadable assets
- Verbose API responses
- Logically unnecessary sensitive-field disclosure
- Autocomplete and browser caching behavior on sensitive fields
- Login and recovery throttling
- API request rate controls
- Account creation / invite abuse controls
- Repeated transaction protections
- Resource-intensive function abuse indicators
- Anti-automation controls where appropriate
- Safe concurrency and race-condition hypotheses when authorized
- Independent validation of suspected findings
- False-positive rejection and duplicate correlation
- Severity and business-impact analysis
- Evidence capture and reproduction notes
- Executive summary and technical findings
- Prioritized remediation recommendations
- Finding ownership and target-date tracking
- Retest of remediated findings
- Status progression: Open → In Progress → Remediated → Verified Closed
Controlled Higher-Impact Validation
For clients who need stronger evidence than standard non-destructive testing can provide, SecAgent can offer a separately governed validation phase. This service is designed to demonstrate whether selected, already-identified vulnerabilities are genuinely exploitable while minimizing operational risk. It is not automatically included in a standard pentest.
What this phase can validate
- Controlled proof that a confirmed access-control weakness crosses an approved security boundary
- Controlled validation of authentication or session weaknesses using designated test accounts
- Limited proof-of-impact for selected injection or input-handling findings using benign markers and non-destructive payloads
- Controlled API authorization and privilege-boundary validation
- Business-logic abuse validation using test transactions, sandbox records, or pre-approved synthetic data
- Safe file/upload handling validation in an isolated or explicitly approved test location
- Targeted verification that a vulnerability can expose only pre-designated test data or canary records
- Post-remediation controlled retesting of the same approved vulnerability path
Default exclusions: denial-of-service, destructive data modification, persistence, ransomware behavior, credential theft, uncontrolled lateral movement, attacks on third parties, or access beyond the minimum proof required.
Controlled Exploit Validation
Added to an eligible authorized pentest. Final price depends on the number of findings selected, application complexity, test environment, and required controls.
$2,500 starting package
$4,500 starting package
$7,500+ scoped quote
Quoted separately if required
Mandatory approval workflow
Only a previously identified or specifically approved hypothesis moves forward.
SecAgent documents the target, test objective, expected evidence, stop conditions, and rollback plan.
A named client representative with authority approves the exact validation action and testing window.
SecAgent requires a second internal approval before the higher-impact action is released.
The test runs within hard scope, time, request-rate, data, and action limits.
Evidence is captured, temporary test artifacts are removed, system health is checked, and the action is closed.
Safety controls
- Prefer staging or a production-equivalent clone whenever practical
- Production testing requires explicit production authorization
- Hard allowlist for domains, hosts, routes, accounts, and APIs
- Canary/test data instead of real customer data wherever possible
- Maximum request rate and concurrency limits
- Pre-test health snapshot and post-test integrity check
- Automatic stop on elevated errors, latency, resource pressure, or unexpected state change
- Emergency kill switch available to SecAgent operators and designated client personnel
- No automatic chaining into a newly discovered system or privilege level
- Every state-changing action individually logged with timestamp and approval reference
- Backups/rollback plan required for approved state-changing validation
- Minimum-impact proof: stop once sufficient evidence has been obtained
Pricing that scales with testing depth.
Final scope and pricing can change based on application size, authentication complexity, API surface, number of user roles, and testing window.
Security Assessment
- Passive posture review
- TLS & security headers
- Surface observations
- Executive summary
Vulnerability Assessment
- Controlled crawling
- Safe vulnerability tests
- Evidence review
- Remediation guidance
Authorized Multi-Agent Pentest
- Multi-agent web testing
- Manual/human validation gates
- API & access-control review
- Detailed pentest report
- One retest cycle
Authenticated Pentest
- Role-aware testing
- Business-logic analysis
- Expanded API testing
- Multiple test accounts
- Two retest cycles
Continuous Security
- Recurring assessments
- Change-based retesting
- Trend metrics
- Executive reporting
- Priority review queue
Start a SecAgent engagement.
Tell us about the application you want assessed. Sentinel™ remains available as the floating assistant if you have questions while completing the form.
What happens next
Frequently asked questions.
Is SecAgent™ an automated vulnerability scanner?
Not only. The platform is designed around coordinated specialist agents, deterministic test modules, evidence capture, scope enforcement, AI-assisted reasoning, and human approval for higher-impact actions.
Can SecAgent test any website?
No. Active testing is limited to systems for which the client has legal authority to authorize testing.
Will every finding be called a vulnerability?
No. Reports should distinguish confirmed vulnerabilities, probable vulnerabilities, security weaknesses, informational observations, and rejected or false-positive findings.
Can SecAgent test authenticated dashboards?
Yes, in plans that include authorized test accounts. Role-based testing is especially useful for access-control review.
